2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1972 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 5,460 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 355 more horse power than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (530 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 493 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Suzuki |
| Model | CLK | LJ 20 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 5460 cc | 359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 382 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 530 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
