2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 2060 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (461 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
Model | CLK | 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 4966 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 461 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2830 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2160 mm |