2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Zo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (161 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 90 kg more than 1999 Renault Zo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (240 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1999 Renault Zo | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
Model | CLK | Zo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 83 L |