2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2004 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Proton Gen-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Proton Gen-2 would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (460 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2004 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Proton |
| Model | CLK | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 4966 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 460 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2610 mm |
