2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 1660 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CLK | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 382 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2830 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3678 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1585 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 2.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 1.9 L/100km |
