2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 21 kg more than 2013 Ferrari California.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (510 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ferrari California. (504 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ferrari California.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2013 Ferrari California | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ferrari |
Model | CLK | California |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 504 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1709 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4562 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1308 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 78 L |