2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 415 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
| Model | CLS | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3498 cc | 2259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2680 mm |
