2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS (288 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2011 Holden UTE. (281 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS (365 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden UTE. (350 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden UTE. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 2011 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2011 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
Model | CLS | UTE |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 365 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |