2009 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1954 Saab 92B
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Saab 92B would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 2045 kg more than 1954 Saab 92B.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 1954 Saab 92B has manual transmission. 1954 Saab 92B will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz E | 1954 Saab 92B | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Saab |
Model | E | 92B |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2830 kg | 785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2480 mm |