2009 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1976 TVR 3000
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 5,438 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 815 kg more than 1976 TVR 3000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 1976 TVR 3000 has manual transmission. 1976 TVR 3000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz E | 1976 TVR 3000 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | TVR |
Model | E | 3000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5438 cc | 2994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 469 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 58 L |