2009 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 5,461 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 333 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 2060 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E (530 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 435 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz E | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
Model | E | 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 5461 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 382 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 530 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2830 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2160 mm |