2009 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1984 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1476 kg more than 1984 Plymouth Voyager.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz E | 1984 Plymouth Voyager | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Plymouth |
| Model | E | Voyager |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2832 kg | 1356 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2860 mm |
