2009 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E (268 HP) has 73 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E (350 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz E | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | E | FTO |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 202 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1300 mm |