2009 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1660 kg more than 2000 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 2000 Nissan Bluebird has manual transmission. 2000 Nissan Bluebird will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz E | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | E | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2148 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2830 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |