2009 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2000 Plymouth Prowler
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Plymouth Prowler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Plymouth Prowler would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Plymouth Prowler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 6 kg more than 2000 Plymouth Prowler.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Plymouth Prowler (610 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercedes-Benz E. (350 Nm). This means 2000 Plymouth Prowler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercedes-Benz E.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz E | 2000 Plymouth Prowler | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Plymouth |
Model | E | Prowler |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 610 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.9 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 9.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2880 mm |