2009 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 245 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz E.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Suzuki F1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E (350 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz E | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Suzuki |
| Model | E | F1 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 45 L |
