2009 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E (221 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1317 kg more than 2004 Mercury Sable. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E (540 Nm) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz E | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercury |
Model | E | Sable |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 2983 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 540 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.7:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2830 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 68 L |