2009 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1963 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (210 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Zodiac.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (540 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 349 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (191 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1963 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | ML | Zodiac |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 540 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 45 L |