2009 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1966 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (210 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (540 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 451 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Bluebird. (89 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1966 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | ML | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 540 Nm | 89 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2390 mm |