2009 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1972 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 5,461 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 288 more horse power than 1972 Mercedes-Benz E. (94 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1972 Mercedes-Benz E.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Mercedes-Benz E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (530 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mercedes-Benz E. (159 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mercedes-Benz E.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1972 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | ML | E |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5461 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 382 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 530 Nm | 159 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2760 mm |