2009 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | ML | Camargue |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5461 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 382 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 107 L |
