2009 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (210 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (124 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (540 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
Model | ML | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 540 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2640 mm |