2009 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (268 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (225 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee (407 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML. (350 Nm). This means 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Jeep |
Model | ML | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 407 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 87 L |