2009 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML. (210 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Toyota Tundra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (540 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (427 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
Model | ML | Tundra |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 540 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 45 L |