2009 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (350 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Jeep |
Model | ML | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 78 L |