2009 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (245 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (540 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mercedes-Benz C. (340 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | 2013 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | ML | C |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 245 HP |
Torque | 540 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4591 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2008 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |