2009 Mercedes-Benz R vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R (221 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1951 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1951 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz R weights approximately 648 kg more than 1951 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Talbot Baby. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz R | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Talbot |
| Model | R | Baby |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 2690 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2298 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 3130 mm |
