2009 Mercedes-Benz R vs. 1982 Mercedes-Benz T
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 2,985 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mercedes-Benz T weights approximately 116 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz R.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mercedes-Benz T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mercedes-Benz R has automatic transmission and 1982 Mercedes-Benz T has manual transmission. 1982 Mercedes-Benz T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercedes-Benz R will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz R | 1982 Mercedes-Benz T | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | R | T |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2985 cc | 2307 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1356 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2800 mm |
