2009 Mercedes-Benz R vs. 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,461 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (235 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mercedes-Benz R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R (530 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (408 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz R | 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Jeep |
Model | R | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5461 cc | 4701 cc |
Horse Power | 382 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 530 Nm | 408 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2700 mm |