2009 Mercedes-Benz R vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mercedes-Benz R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mercedes-Benz R would be higher. At 5,461 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R (530 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo C70. (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz R | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | R | C70 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5461 cc | 2400 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 382 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 530 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |