2009 Mercedes-Benz R vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mercedes-Benz R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mercedes-Benz R would be higher. At 5,461 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 2013 Nissan Juke. (185 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 2013 Nissan Juke.
Because 2013 Nissan Juke is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mercedes-Benz R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R (530 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Juke. (240 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Juke.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz R | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | R | Juke |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5461 cc | 1600 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 382 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 530 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 45 L |