2009 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,980 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 115 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
| Model | SL | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 661 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2760 mm |
