2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK (355 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 310 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK (510 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | SLK | Cedric |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5439 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2540 mm |