2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 170 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
Model | SLK | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2760 mm |