2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 2001 Suzuki SX
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki SX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki SX would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK (300 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki SX. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki SX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Suzuki SX weights approximately 226 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki SX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK (359 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki SX. (106 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki SX.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 2001 Suzuki SX | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Suzuki |
Model | SLK | SX |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1298 cc |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 359 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1536 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2460 mm |