2009 Mercedes-Benz Vito vs. 1970 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz Vito is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercury Cougar (167 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2009 Mercedes-Benz Vito. (120 HP @ 1800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercedes-Benz Vito. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz Vito weights approximately 366 kg more than 1970 Mercury Cougar.

Because 1970 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz Vito, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercury Cougar (363 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercedes-Benz Vito. (300 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1970 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercedes-Benz Vito.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mercedes-Benz Vito 1970 Mercury Cougar
Make Mercedes-Benz Mercury
Model Vito Cougar
Year Released 2009 1970
Body Type Van Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2151 cc 5769 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 167 HP
Engine RPM 1800 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 363 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 88 mm 101.7 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.4 mm 88.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 19.0:1 8.6:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2016 kg 1650 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 5840 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 2000 mm
Vehicle Height 1850 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2860 mm