2009 Mercury Mariner vs. 1975 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2009 Mercury Mariner is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Datsun 260Z (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2009 Mercury Mariner. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Datsun 260Z should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercury Mariner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 825 kg more than 1975 Datsun 260Z.
Because 2009 Mercury Mariner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Datsun 260Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Mariner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Datsun 260Z (213 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercury Mariner. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1975 Datsun 260Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercury Mariner.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercury Mariner | 1975 Datsun 260Z | |
Make | Mercury | Datsun |
Model | Mariner | 260Z |
Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2488 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 213 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4135 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.1 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |