2009 Mercury Mariner vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mercury Mariner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mercury Mariner would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercury Mariner (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercury Mariner (171 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mercury Mariner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercury Mariner | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mercury | Renault |
Model | Mariner | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |