2009 Mercury Milan vs. 1966 Mercury Comet

To start off, 2009 Mercury Milan is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (405 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 2009 Mercury Milan. (158 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercury Milan.

Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Milan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (645 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 489 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercury Milan. (156 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercury Milan.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mercury Milan 1966 Mercury Comet
Make Mercury Mercury
Model Milan Comet
Year Released 2009 1966
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2260 cc 6393 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 158 HP 405 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 156 Nm 645 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 3400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 5180 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2950 mm