2009 Mercury Milan vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mercury Milan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mercury Milan would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 2009 Mercury Milan. (221 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercury Milan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 860 kg more than 2009 Mercury Milan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercury Milan. (278 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercury Milan.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercury Milan | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | Mercury | Cadillac |
Model | Milan | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.4:1 | 10.4 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1832 kg | 2692 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5639 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1892 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 18 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 117 L |