2009 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2009 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercury Mountaineer | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Mercury | Suzuki |
| Model | Mountaineer | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 344 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2060 mm |
