2009 Mercury Sable vs. 1963 Mercury Monterey
To start off, 2009 Mercury Sable is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mercury Monterey. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mercury Monterey would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Mercury Monterey is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Sable weights approximately 149 kg more than 1963 Mercury Monterey.
Because 2009 Mercury Sable is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Mercury Monterey. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercury Sable | 1963 Mercury Monterey | |
| Make | Mercury | Mercury |
| Model | Sable | Monterey |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 6964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1776 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3050 mm |
