2009 Mercury Sable vs. 1982 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2009 Mercury Sable is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Sable weights approximately 775 kg more than 1982 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2009 Mercury Sable is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Plymouth Reliant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercury Sable | 1982 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Mercury | Plymouth |
| Model | Sable | Reliant |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2260 mm |
