2009 Mercury Sable vs. 2002 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2009 Mercury Sable is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercury Sable (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2002 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Windstar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercury Sable | 2002 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Mercury | Ford |
Model | Sable | Windstar |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5103 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1946 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3066 mm |