2009 Mercury Sable vs. 2002 Peugeot RC
To start off, 2009 Mercury Sable is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Peugeot RC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Peugeot RC would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Sable weights approximately 975 kg more than 2002 Peugeot RC.
Because 2009 Mercury Sable is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Peugeot RC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 2002 Peugeot RC has manual transmission. 2002 Peugeot RC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercury Sable | 2002 Peugeot RC | |
| Make | Mercury | Peugeot |
| Model | Sable | RC |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1160 mm |
