2009 Mercury Sable vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercury Sable (263 HP) has 107 more horse power than 2012 Peugeot RCZ. (156 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2012 Peugeot RCZ.
Because 2009 Mercury Sable is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Peugeot RCZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 2012 Peugeot RCZ has manual transmission. 2012 Peugeot RCZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercury Sable | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | Mercury | Peugeot |
| Model | Sable | RCZ |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 156 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1359 mm |
