2009 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander (167 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Triumph |
Model | Outlander | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 166 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |