2009 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2005 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Sienna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Sienna would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Sienna (230 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander. (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Because 2005 Toyota Sienna is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Sienna will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Sienna (328 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander. (167 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2005 Toyota Sienna | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Outlander | Sienna |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 3298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 166 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 328 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 76 L |