2009 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2006 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Holden Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Holden Caprice would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 176 more horse power than 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Because 2006 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander. (226 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2006 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Holden |
| Model | Outlander | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
