2009 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 2004 Peugeot 406
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Peugeot 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Peugeot 406 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero (163 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2004 Peugeot 406. (106 HP @ 1750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero should accelerate faster than 2004 Peugeot 406. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 41 kg more than 2004 Peugeot 406. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Peugeot 406. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero (373 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Peugeot 406. (250 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Peugeot 406. 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero has automatic transmission and 2004 Peugeot 406 has manual transmission. 2004 Peugeot 406 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mitsubishi Pajero | 2004 Peugeot 406 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Peugeot |
| Model | Pajero | 406 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 105 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 17.8:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1499 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 70 L |
